Final Conclusions
Conclusions of Experiment one (All Video Blurred)
![]() |
The easiest emotional state to detect was Anger (73%) |
![]() |
Sadness is the most difficult emotional state to detect from motion (22%) |
![]() |
Neutral ,boredom and sadness were confused (around 28%) |
![]() |
Stress was confused with neutral in 25% |
![]() |
Confusion between joy and boredom is not low (19.3%) |
Conclusions of Experiment two (Only Face Blurred)
![]() |
The easiest emotional state to detect is Joy (65%) |
The second easiest emotional state to detect was Stress (59%) | |
![]() |
Sadness is the most difficult emotional state to detect (30.43%) |
![]() |
Neutral and stress where confused in approx 23% |
![]() |
Anger was confused with stress in 19% |
![]() |
Confusion between boredom and neutral in 36% |
Conclusions of Movement Analysis
Neutral
Horizontal
and vertical movement of the head and hand holding the utensil highly correlated
Inactivity
time for horizontal and vertical movements of head and hands in the order of
Seconds (greater than 500ms)
Moderate
number of variations of the signals over time.
Sadness
Less
horizontal and vertical movement (variations) in head and hand not holding the
utensil
Hand
holding the utensil kept in a fixed vertical and horizontal position over long
periods of time (in the order of seconds)
Anger
Hand
holding the utensil with higher variations over time and large magnitude. The
lines of the plot are spiky.
Apparent
calm followed by compulsive movements of hand holding the utensil
Moderate
movement of head.
Hapiness/Joy
Considerable Horizontal and vertical movement of the head. Small magnitude continuous
oscillations.
Horizontal movement of head and horizontal movement of hand holding the utensil
correlated.
Stress
High and constant variations in the vertical and horizontal movements of the
head and hand holding the utensil.
Boredom
long periods of overal inactivity.
Slow variations in vertical and horizontal movementof head and hand holding
the utensil.
Final Conclusions
It
could be possible to build a computer vision system to detect the features mentioned
in the movement analysis conclusions. This system would not be very accurate
because all people eat in different ways. Some subjects mentioned that they
will detect the emotional state of the person eating easier if they knew the
person well. I think that using a computer vision system to analyze people eating
in their homes in a daily basis in combination with other systems would give
a better and customized detection.
If
I were to repeat the experiment analizing the head and hand movements when people
is doing other activities I would expect to get simmilar features such as for
example sudden movements with high magnitude variations for anger and slow movements
for sadness.
Possible Improvements
If
I were to repeat the experiment again, I would hire professional actors or even
better, I would get video from hidden cameras of people, and then, I would try
to modify their mood.
I
would use more subjects for the experiment. More than 200 probably.
I
would analyze the movement of head and hands for a longer period of time. Each
video lasts for 22 seconds. I would increase the duration to more than 5 minutes
(probably during until the people really finish eating).