The main advantage of this chemistry seems to be that is is a compact (portable) power-source for inflatables. What scenarios can it do that would be impossible to do, even as a prototype, if they weren’t so compact/portable/self-powered? The other advantage is that is it easily initiated by the user directly – no buttons etc. Does this have to be a binary on/off reaction, or can it be controlled continuously? However, I’m sure there are limitations for max speed, reversibility, max inflation, etc. What real-world scenarios make the most sense given the advantages and constraints? Esp. what interactions make this more compelling than just an inflatable counterpart to the glowstick or hand-warmer?
-Dan
Udayan’s comments:
Autoinflation is an interesting phenomenon. However, from an interaction standpoint what does this bring to the table? Can you identify scenarios where autoinfltation matters?
Almost “realtime” inflation and buoyancy are interesting props, I think you should explore this. In case of life-vest, it makes sense to have a water triggered inflation to give buoyancy.
Another way to think about this is to see how to bring programmability to buoyancy across time.
]]>I’m a chemist, artist and maker from israel, currently studying at the MIT Media Lab.
I am passionate about buildings things and aim at solving real world problems in an aesthetically pleasing, simple and efficient way.
email: amosg@mit.edu
website: http://cargocollective.com/manofathousandhobbies
]]>